Writers cherish the myth that their work will make their names immortal. And it is true we have remembered some authors for thousands of years. However, if you want to be heard across time, you have to write something timeless.
My friend Mike and I are fascinated by forgotten writers, especially forgotten science fiction writers. We can’t help but wonder why a writer quits after their initial success of selling a few stories or maybe a novel. Mike texted me the other day about such a writer he discovered in an interview with Geraldine Brooks in The New York Times.
It was part of their By the Book series, where all writers are asked the same standard questions. My favorite question: “What’s your favorite book no one else has heard of?” Often this makes for an interesting title to chase down. Brooks said: “‘No Man on Earth,’ by Walter Moudy. The only other person I know who has read it is my son because I pressed it on him.”
So one well-regarded literary writer resurrects Walter F. Moudy 49 years after he died. That one little mention in the Times got me to read his novel. Maybe a few other people will too. And it’s a pretty good science fiction story for 1964. The question is, could it have been better? What would have made that novel stay in print? Is it worth reprinting? And do I recommend you read it?
You can read a pdf copy of No Man On Earth here.
It turns out that No Man On Earth is a forgotten science fiction novel by a forgotten science fiction writer, Walter F. Moudy (1929-1973). His ISFDB entry lists one novel and four short stories. This novel appeared in October of 1964, and then three of his four stories appeared in April and May of 1965, two in Fantastic and one in Amazing, both edited by Cele Lalli (Goldsmith). Moudy would have been in his mid-thirties. In 1966 he published another novel, The Ninth Commandment, probably not science fiction, and one I can’t track down. Finally, in 1975, after his death, Moudy had one more story, a novella, published in an original anthology, In the Wake of Man. The other two authors in that book were Gene Wolfe and R. A. Lafferty, pretty impressive company.
Besides No Man On Earth, I’ve read his three stories in Fantastic and Amazing, but it would cost me $75 to read his final story and that’s too much. For me, Walter F. Moudy’s science fiction legacy is that one novel, two short stories, and a novelette. Not much to go by, but still, I’m terribly envious since I’m a lifelong would-be science fiction writer. I’d give anything to have contributed even that much to the genre.
Why after his initial success in 1964-1966 did Moudy quit writing? And how did Roger Elwood get his last story? I guess Moudy tried one more time before he died to say something in print. But maybe Elwood had been holding it for years, and it was written in the mid-sixties. Reviewers haven’t been kind to it.
I was able to track down a few biographical details. Moudy was from Missouri, served in the Air Force from 1950 to 1953, got a degree in 1954, and then a law degree in 1957. He was Phi Beta Kappa. Moudy was married and had three children. In other words, he had a successful life and didn’t need to be a writer. Still, as I read his work over the last few days, I felt he had something to say. At least in No Man On Earth.
His three short stories were rather minor. The first, “The Dreamer,” was about a young man who wanted to get rich and famous as a space trader. The story was told like a fable. Its redeeming feature was a super-intelligent parrot. The second, “I Think They Love Me,” is about rock stars going to extreme lengths to survive hordes of screaming teenage girls. This was written a year after The Beatles hit America and was kind of cute, but not really worth remembering. The last, and the one most anthologized, is “The Survivor,” about a televised war game between America and Russia. It reminded me of The Hunger Games. This story came out in 1965 and was probably inspired by the 1964 Olympic games and the films Dr. Strangelove and Fail-Safe. “The Survivor” was gritty, detailed, and suggested each country sacrifice 100 men every four years in a fight to the death rather than risking total national annihilation.
Those three stories were somewhat entertaining, especially the last one, but they don’t leave the kind of impression that Moudy was making a statement. However, No Man On Earth does. Writers can make different kinds of statements. They can aim to write a better story than what’s written before. Or they can capture their times realistically in words. And common with science fiction writers, they can say something philosophical about reality. And there are so many other ways.
For example, I believe Robert Heinlein was influenced by the success of Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand in 1957, and that’s why he aimed so high with Stranger in a Strange Land. In his later years, Heinlein repeatedly tried to convince fans that Starship Troopers (1959), Stranger in a Strange Land (1961) and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress (1966) were books that he wanted to be remembered for because they expressed his philosophy on freedom and responsibility.
My guess is Moudy was inspired by Stranger in a Strange Land when he wrote No Man On Earth. Heinlein’s main character Valentine Michael Smith is a human raised by Martians who taught him psychic powers. Moudy’s main character, Thad Stone, had a human mother and alien father and was a super-genius. Both novels are told with picaresque plotting. Both books comment on sex and society. Moudy has Stone tour many planets and visits many kinds of societies and civilizations. No Man On Earth ran 176 pages in its first publication, a slim paperback original to Stranger’s 408 pages in the G. P. Putnam’s Sons first-edition hardback. Heinlein was obviously trying to hit one out of the genre after over twenty years of being a big fish in a small pond. Frank Herbert also aimed sky high with Dune in 1965. It was also over 400 pages.
There are a lot of one-hit wonders in the book world but few writers struggle with their masterpieces like Harper Lee or John Kennedy Toole. My guess is Moudy knocked this novel out quickly and was probably paid around $750 for his paperback original and when it disappeared on the twirling wire racks after a couple of months felt his time was better spent being a lawyer. If he had written a 400-page monster and got it published by a major hardback publisher No Man On Earth might have had a better chance. He just didn’t aim high enough.
It would have also helped if he had written No Man On Earth in an innovative style that made the genre take notice, like Dune and Stranger in a Strange Land. Moudy’s story and writing reminded me a bit of Leigh Brackett’s The Long Tomorrow (1955), Edgar Pangborn’s A Mirror for Observers (1955), and Walter Tevis’s The Man Who Fell to Earth (1963), all books he could have read and could have inspired No Man On Earth.
Obviously, if Geraldine Brooks fondly remembers No Man On Earth in 2022 so it can’t be a stinker. I liked it quite a lot and rushed through it in two days because it was compelling in the old-fashion kind of science fiction I love. It’s great that Tevis’s 1963 novel is still remembered, and I think it’s a shame that Moudy’s book isn’t more remembered.
James Wallace Harris, 6/21/22
14 thoughts on “Blowing Your Chance to Speak to the Future”
I was completely unaware of Walter Moudy until reading your insightful and quite poignant post.
In a larger context, though the date of publication escapes my memory, I do remember reading – in the New York Times Book Review from the 50s or 60s – a lengthy essay (in equal measures humorous and serious) about the topic of the “one shot novelist”. Part of the “take-away” from this Time’s piece was that for some writers, the nominal completion and publication of “a” literary work – a single literary work; one and only one literary work – represents a goal, that once attained recedes into the past, in terms of centrality and importance … whether from practicality and pragmatism, or, emotional drive.
In effect and reality, the person then moves on.
This parallels you supposition that, “My guess is Moudy knocked this novel out quickly and was probably paid around $750 for his paperback original and when it disappeared on the twirling wire racks after a couple of months felt his time was better spent being a lawyer.”
In any event, I just downloaded the PDF version of the book, and – from a cursory glance – had the impression that the cover was by Richard Powers, which was confirmed by a glance at the book’s ISFDB entry.
Thanks for your work!
P.S. – My blog is currently very much off-line, but I hope to get it “up and running” again in the (relatively?!) near future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d like to read that article. I subscribe to The New York Review of Books which entitles me access to back issues. I’ll need to set up a login and check that out. I’ll post a reply here if I find anything.
Alas…(!)… The only information I can provide is that the essay appeared in the New York Times Book Review some time during the 1960s. The essay’s author – name long since forgotten by me – created the example of a fictional writer by the surname of “Gongor” as the template for the life + career of a “one-shot-novelist”.
I remember that access to all Times’ content was free during the early 2000s, but it’s long since become available only through subscription. An possibility would be to access it via a college or university library. Which, if one has long since left the world of academia (as I have), is quite challenging, whether geographically or logistically.
I wish I could be more helpful. Alas, these are my best clues, given that I read the essay on 35mm microfilm (!) in the late 1980s (!!).
Thanks much for your thoughts and essays.
Also an author I’ve never heard of — count me intrigued!
Ah, one of his short stories will fit my media landscape of the future review series! “The Survivor” (1965) in Amazing Stories, May 1965
I read “The Survivor” and should have a review up soon. Solid! I wish he wrote more. I think “The Survivor” was the most anthologized his works — it appeared in some Asimov themed anthologies, and political science SF anthologies, etc.
OH, if you have an Internet Archive account you can borrow Moudy’s final story here: https://archive.org/details/inwakeofmansc00laff/mode/2up?q=%22The+Search+for+Man%22+Moudy
Thanks. I thought I had a $10 copy ordered but they just canceled the order. I wonder if they saw that everyone else was selling it for $75.
Yeah, I’ve had the volume on my Amazon for a long while waiting for a cheaper edition too.
Wow, what a great story. It’s a shame that Moudy didn’t keep writing science fiction. Some publisher really needs to put out the collected works of Walter F. Moudy.
I look forward to anything you end up writing about it! As I mentioned before, I enjoyed “The Survivor.”