There have been quite a few books about Robert A. Heinlein published since the 1960s, however, only two of them are devoted to biography. The rest are about his writing. The main biography to read is the two-volume Robert A. Heinlein: In Dialogue with His Century by William H. Patterson, Jr. It’s still in print. Alec Nevala-Lee’s book, Astounding, is a biography of John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, and L. Ron Hubbard, but it does have a significant amount of material on Heinlein. Farah Mendlesohn’s book, The Pleasant Profession of Robert A. Heinlein does interweave biography with its focus on Heinlein’s writing, but she admits she got most of that biographical information from the Patterson book. Both the Nevala-Lee and Mendlesohn books are in print.

If you want to know about Heinlein the man, read the Patterson volumes and the Nevala-Lee. If you want a modern take on Heinlein’s work try the Mendlesohn. If you want an interesting take on science fiction in the 1940s, I recommend The World Beyond the Hill. It makes an interesting compaion to Astounding by Nevala-Lee.

I’m going to list the books about Heinlein in reverse chronological order. If they are in print, I’ll link the title to Amazon. The out-of-print books can be found on and eBay, as well as other online book dealers. Some of these titles cover more than just Heinlein, but they do cover him in a significant way.

James Wallace Harris 10/6/22

11 thoughts on “Books About Robert A. Heinlein

  1. Many thanks for this overview, Jim! I’ve dipped into some of these books, although I’m less interested in a purely biographical approach than discussions of Heinlein’s work in the context of his larger worldview (including his political views), his place in SF, etc.

    Another book I liked is H. Bruce Franklin’s Robert Heinlein: America as Science Fiction. It’s strongly critical of Heinlein’s politics (not surprising, since Franklin is a Marxist), but at the same time made me want to read more of Heinlein’s work.

    Do you have any thoughts on Spider Robinson’s 1980 essay/speech on Heinlein, “Rah, Rah, R.A.H.!” ?


      1. I agree with Spider Robinson’s essay in some ways, but in some ways–as you’ll see–it’s also a bit over the top.


        1. I’ve been looking over “Rah, Rah, R.A.H!,” and I have read it before. It’s going to be perfect for the essay I’m working on now. I don’t believe we can pin Heinlein down about anything, but we can discuss ideas he was entertaining at different times in his life and in different stories.

          I used to back the defense that Heinlein’s characters weren’t equal to Heinlein the man, that they were just characters. I now believe some of them were fantasies of who Heinlein wanted to be, especially Lazarus Long and Jubal Harshaw. I also think Heinlein prided himself on being a competent man, but I’m guessing he wanted to be a lot more competent. I’m not so sure that part of his real persona was an act, where he was acting like he wanted the public to think of him as an author. I’m also wondering if he didn’t create a Heinlein persona to hide behind and protect his privacy. But his is only conjecture. I might know more after I do all my rereading.


  2. Thanks for the list. This Heinlein journey we’ve joined you on has been so informative, especially the comments/discussions after each essay — so many perspectives on perhaps the best known American writer of sci-fi.

    I was interviewing a prospective candidate to our organization yesterday who indicated in his resume that his college courses were centered around creative writing. As most writers are readers, I asked this young man who he likes to read. First name on his list? Yep.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s cool. Back in the 1960s whenever I met a science fiction fan I’d ask them who their favorite writer was, and of course, everyone said Heinlein. Then we’d go on to discuss who we thought was second. That is until March 1967 when I met my lifelong friend Jim Connell. His first favorite was Arthur C. Clarke. I was flabbergasted. I asked him why Heinlein wasn’t #1. He said he was late returning a Heinlein book to the library and they charged him a fine, which made him mad at Heinlein. We’ve been arguing ever since.


      1. If you’d waited a few years and asked me you’d have gotten a different response, Arthur C. Clarke as well.

        There’s some commentary about Heinlein in some of Asimov’s writings, it may have been the essay parts of The Early Asimov, not sure. Asimov ended up not liking him because of his politics.


        1. I understand (and share to some extent) Asimov’s opposition to Heinlein’s political views, but he always gave him his due and expressed admiration for his writing (at least, the earlier writing that had the strongest influence on SF).

          Regarding Jim’s story, I find it hard to believe that anyone in their right mind would become hostile toward a writer because they had to pay a library fine for returning one of his books late.


        2. Back in the late 1960s I turned against Heinlein too. Heinlein was like a virtual father to me. But both my real father and Heinlein were military men and strong supporters of the Vietnam war. I was against it. I rejected both fathers back then. As I’ve gotten older I’ve been more forgiving of them.


  3. Greetings! Extremely handy assistance In this particular individual report! It’s the little adjustments that will make the greatest modifications. Lots of many thanks for sharing!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s